“In the name of global pe economic or political sanctior to uphold international norn result in humanitarian sufferi Ace and security, powerful nations often impose NS on Weaker states. While such measures are claimed ns, they frequently reflect geopolitical interests and of global governance tnatitution In light of growing concerns over the failure critically examine whether it i a to ensure fairness and multilateral consensus, sanctions. How can global us ethical for dominant nations to unilaterally impose and uphold the princip! governance be reformed to prevent coercive diplomacy Principles of justice, equity, and sovereign dignity?

Topper: Prakhya · AIR 265 · 2025 · Page 15